THE EJECTMENT ORDER AGAINST PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT CASE LAW PAKISTAN DIARIES

The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries

The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries

Blog Article

9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by regulation." It is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and also the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally recognized conviction. Read more

The official court record is maintained via the court of record. Copies of case file documents are not out there about the search site and will need to be ordered from the court of record.  

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted within a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is on the market in specific limited situations, it's generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.

A lot of judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name to the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with founded legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same sort of case.

500,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Every plus the same shall be retained while in the police station into read more the effect that no harm shall be caused to your petitioners. 5. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more

The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation on the police, they usually must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its various pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect rather than abduct. Read more

Problems or Errors In the event you encounter any technical problems with this website (such as a lousy link or simply a portion of the opinion lacking), please notify the eService Middle.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, apart from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. Additionally, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it has issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.

Report this page